Agri Kultuur December / Desember 2015 | Page 43

versity, and funded by the South African Stone Fruit Producers’ Association (SASPA), took a closer look at the plum peel’s permeability to moisture as well as at the handling chain from orchard until the end of cold-storage. What is happening in the orchard regarding the fruit’s susceptibility to moisture loss? It is known that pre-harvest factors such as differences between cultivars, farms, orchards on the same farm, trees in the same orchard, and fruit on the same tree as well as harvest date can play an important role in fruit peel moisture permeability. In our study we found that differences between fruit from the same tree explained more than 45% of the differences in fruit peel permeability during fruit development on the tree. Factors such as position of the fruit on the tree, exposure to sunlight, split pit and shape of the fruit could possibly contribute to the variation in peel permeability of the different fruit on the same three that were of the same maturity. Commercial harvesting is done by hand and fruit are picked according to visual appearance. Fruit maturity is also not determined on the packing line, but fruit is sorted by their visual appearance (colour) and size. This leads to large variation between fruit in packed cartons, and could be a contributing factor why some fruit in the same carton develop shrivel and others not. Additionally, harvest date contributes >20% to the total variance in water vapour permeance of plum cultivars. We found that plum peels were the least permeable to moisture approx. 2 weeks before their respective optimum harvest dates, after which permeability increased two-fold until the fruit was overripe. This drastic increase in peel permeability as the fruit matures is probably caused by changes in the cuticle thickness and composition over time. It is, therefore, strongly recommended that mixed maturity in the carton must be prevented by stricter sorting to prevent over mature fruit, which are more prone to moisture loss and, hence shrivel, to end up in the carton. Cultivar differences contributed > 5% of the differences in fruit peel permeability in this study. We found that ‘Sapphire’, which is highly susceptible to shrivel, have the highest peel permeability to water vapour of the cultivars tested in our study – which explains why it shrivels so easily. ‘African DelightTM’ plums had the second highest peel permeability followed by ‘Songold’. Surprisingly, we found that ‘Laetitia’, which is highly susceptible to shrivel, had the lowest peel permeability to water vapour of the cultivars we tested. ‘African DelightTM’ plums are known for the concentric rings at its pedicel end (Figure 2). We found that these concentric rings are actually open, hairline cracks in the peel of the plums – these act as easy escape routes for moisture from the fruit (Figure 3) and probably is the main reason why this cultivar is so prone Figure 1. A shrivelled plum after 7 weeks of coldstorage Fi gure 2. Concentric rings found commonly at the stem-end of African Delight plums Photo Adriaan Theron Photo Adriaan Theron