Agri Kultuur August / Agustus 2016 | Page 11

Figure 1. Source: Conti, FD. “Conservation Agriculture and Soil Fauna: Only Benefits or also Potential Threats? A review”. EC Agriculture 2.5 (2015): 473-482. controls surface runoff, slows soil drying and enhances root exploration. Thus, biological tillage (i.e., soil microorganisms, roots and soil fauna taking over the tillage functions through implemented crop rotations) is opted in place of mechanical tillage. For this reason, CA is prompted as an ecological sound alternative to more conventional approaches. Although CA is proposed as a system based on integrated management of available soil, water and biological resources, combined with as little external inputs as feasible, as currently practised, it is still a very high input system that depends too heavily on agrochemical inputs that is not ideal. Another pillar of CA is the use of crop rotations, which arose as one of the earliest sustainable agricultural practices. It has been argued quite eloquently that without the use of crop rotations the distribution of profit now favours agricultural-related industries (e.g. fertilizers, pesticides, seeds) and not the farmers. Crop rotation may reduce pathogen carry-over on crop residues in the soil. Yield declines in crop monoculture systems is being attributed to the fact that the soil biological balance may be skewed in favor of pathogenic soil microbiota that can lie dormant for many years. Even a short rotation cycle can offer significant relief from pest pressures because of rotationinduced changes in the composition of the soil biota. Crop rotations, however, have to be economically viable to be adopted by farmers and may still require a fallow period to be effective for some diseases, like Pythium and Rhizoctonia that have a wide host range. In addition, it is known that pests can also adapt to crop rotation. A lot of emphasis of CA is on soil improvements (and rightly so given the state of arable soils), but an often-neglected aspect of CA pertains to its usefulness in mitigating the effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions into the atmosphere that contributes to climate change. It is widely acknowledged that reducing CO2 emissions is necessary to alleviate the projected negative impacts of climate change. With the emergence of crop residue management in CA practices as a strategy to improve soil productivity it has inadvertently lend itself as a means to reduce CO2 release to the atmosphere as well. The build up of SOM serves to sequester C in soils. It is estimated that agricultural soils have the capacity to significantly capture C in excess of that by terrestrial plants, with the potential for expanded C sequestration. Currently, agriculture and other forms of land use contribute about a third