2015-16 State of Education in Tennessee | Page 31

these assessments provide essential data for All Tennessee elementary schools began informing instruction. However, many educators implementing RTI2 during the 2014-15 school expressed dissatisfaction with the interim and year. For middle and high schools, 2015-16 is the benchmark assessments available to them, especially first year of full implementation. The Tennessee those purchased from outside vendors. Common Department of Education has supported RTI2 concerns included that the assessments are not implementation by training school-level teams fully aligned to standards and that the data reports and providing technical assistance to districts on teachers receive are not detailed enough. Some issues such as data analysis and differentiated educators mentioned having to settle for lower- instruction.89 While RTI2 is a state requirement, quality assessments because of deficient funding. there is no specific state funding allotment for this Others expressed a desire for the state to provide intervention. more guidance on which interim and benchmark assessments to use. Still others would like the state to Educators who participated in SCORE’s 2015 create a single statewide benchmark assessment.86 Listening Tour had mixed opinions about RTI2. Many felt that it was a much-needed change RTI . Tennessee educators use the Response to and had already seen promising results. Some Instruction and Intervention (RTI2) framework to identify cited it as one of the most positive changes to students in need of intervention in reading, math, or Tennessee education policy and practice in the writing. Since July 2014, RTI2 has been the sole method past few years. Other educators felt, however, by which Tennessee students can be identified as that the state provided insufficient guidance and having a specific learning disability. RTI2 is a tiered support for implementing RTI2. Several cited lack model that provides progressively more intensive of funding or personnel as a serious challenge to interventions based on individual student needs and implementation. Some had difficulty finding time in responses to prior interventions. Students receiving the school day to schedule interventions. Finally, interventions are assessed periodically to monitor their many educators were concerned about the amount progress.87 The RTI2 model is illustrated in Figure 5. of assessment required to fully implement RTI2.90 Figure 5. The RTI2 Model 88 Tennessee’s State Standards. Implementation 2 of Tennessee’s current standards in English language arts and math began in the 2011-12 school TIER I All students receive high-quality instruction grounded in Tennessee’s State Standards. TIER II In addition to Tier I instruction, students who fall below the 25th percentile in math and reading receive extra help through intensive interventions. year with kindergarten through second grade. In the 2012-13 school year, all districts in Tennessee implemented the new math standards in grades 3-8, while 60 districts piloted the new English language arts standards. Districts statewide fully implemented the standards in both subjects and all grades beginning in the 2013-14 school year. This section provides an overview of recent policy and legislative changes related to Tennessee’s State Standards and highlights the successes and challenges educators face in the implementation of TIER III In addition to Tier I instruction, extra help is provided to the standards. Reviewing Tennessee’s State Standards. students who don’t make significant progress with Tier II In October 2014, Governor Haslam announced interventions, are 1.5-2 grade levels behind, or are below a public review process for Tennessee’s State the 10th percentile. These students receive research-based interventions in their specific area of need. Standards for English language arts and math. The State Board of Education typically reviews academic 30